Strictly Come Dancing will put three couples into the dance-off for the first time during its Halloween results show, turning a familiar elimination format into a test of whether more choice means more fairness.

The change follows Shaun Wright-Phillips’ departure and will place the three couples with the lowest combined judges’ scores and public votes at risk. Only one pair will leave, before the programme returns to its usual two-couple dance-off format the following week.¹

Some viewers have welcomed the fact that there will not be a double elimination, but others regard the twist as at odds with the show’s usual tone. One commenter described it as “dramatic” but “a bit mean”, arguing that repeated format changes could alienate regular viewers who see Strictly as a feel-good family programme.¹

Former professional Ian Waite takes the opposite view. He said the extra place could help ensure that strong performers are not eliminated after one weak week, calling it “a great addition because it’s judged on the dancing and not just popularity.”² His argument rests on the judges having a broader comparison: two couples can be saved, rather than forcing a choice between only two competitors.

The revised voting mechanics also sharpen the judges’ role. Craig Revel Horwood said that, instead of choosing which couple to save as they normally do, the panel will vote for the pair they want to send home.³

That emphasis on judges’ judgment comes as former professional James Jordan has questioned whether this series’ scoring has been too generous. After the first 10s were awarded in week five, he said: “I don’t think anyone should have got a ten.”³ For supporters, the triple dance-off offers a corrective to public-vote volatility; for critics, it risks adding tension to a format valued precisely for its warmth.